Obscenity and pornography decisions of the United States Supreme Court, Maureen Harrison & Steve Gilbert, editors
Type
Label
Obscenity and pornography decisions of the United States Supreme Court, Maureen Harrison & Steve Gilbert, editors
Language
eng
Bibliography note
Includes bibliographical references (pages [201]-204) and index
Index
index present
Literary Form
non fiction
Main title
Obscenity and pornography decisions of the United States Supreme Court
Nature of contents
bibliography
Responsibility statement
Maureen Harrison & Steve Gilbert, editors
Table Of Contents
Publicly funded "pornographic" art. National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley -- The indecent Internet. Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union -- X-rated cable broadcasts. Denver Telecommunications v. FCC -- The striptease. Barnes v. Glen Theatre -- "Dial-a-Porn". Sable Communications v. FCC -- "Filthy" school library books. Island Trees Schools v. Pico -- Child pornography. New York v. Ferber -- The seven words you can't say on the radio. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation -- Sexually explicit mail. Miller v. California -- Pornography and privacy. Stanley v. Georgia -- Smut peddling. Ginsberg v. New York -- The book banned in Boston. Fanny Hill v. Massachusetts -- Hardcore films. Jacobellis v. Ohio -- Utterly without redeeming social value. Roth v. United States, Alberts v. California -- The trial of James Joyce's Ulysses
Contributor
Subject
Content
Incoming Resources
- Has instance1