Bibliograph

Suggestions for evaluating the quality of the Army's science and technology program, the portfolio and its execution, John W. Lyons, Richard Chait, and James Ratches

Type

Label

Suggestions for evaluating the quality of the Army's science and technology program, the portfolio and its execution, John W. Lyons, Richard Chait, and James Ratches

Language

eng

Bibliography note

Includes bibliographical references

resource.governmentPublication

federal national government publication

Index

no index present

Literary Form

non fiction

Main title

Suggestions for evaluating the quality of the Army's science and technology program

Nature of contents

dictionariesbibliography

Responsibility statement

John W. Lyons, Richard Chait, and James Ratches

Series statement

Defense & technology papers, no. 99

Sub title

the portfolio and its execution

Summary

The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Research and Technology requested that the Center for Technology and National Security Policy (CTNSP) suggest approaches to evaluating the quality of the current U.S. Army Science and Technology (S & T) portfolio and the quality of its execution. This paper contains the results of both studies

Table Of Contents

Introduction -- The Army S & T portfolio -- The basics of evaluating the portfolio -- Evaluating the quality of the program and its execution -- Summary of report and recommendations

Contributor

Creator